A List and Brief Description of The Ancient Greek and Roman Gods

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Greek_mythological_figures

What are Gods? (Part 2): Where Do They Take Us?

Gods are reflections -- and projections -- of self and group (community)-ideals.

Have you ever heard of an 'imperfect' God? A 'weak' God? An 'insecure' or 'inferior' God? I have never heard of such a God. It is an exercise in self-contradiction. Gods are meant to be 'worshiped' and you don't worship something and/or someone that/who is imperfect, weak, insecure, inferior...

So why do we worship Gods? Is it our drive to be perfect? And/or our wish or need or drive to be 'vicariously perfect' by associating ourselves with -- and worshiping --someone or something who we perceive to being greater -- and more perfect (or 'perfectly perfect') -- than ourselves?

It is important that we clear up some points and make some distinctions before I delve seriously into this issue.

Firstly, we must distinguish between 'Gods' (who and/or what we are worshiping) and 'religion' (the individual and/or group symbolic, ritual process whereby we do our 'worshiping').

Secondly, you have to know who you are dealing with here: you are dealing with me, DGB -- a philosopher, a humanist, a strong supporter of The Enlightenment-Romantic Philosophical Period, and a supporter of Spinozean Pantheist-Deist Spiritual-Romantic Values.

What does this mean? It means that I would sooner 'worship the glory of God and Creation and Life' driving in the mountains of Alberta, or driving on the mountain shores of Cape Breton Island or Lake Superior, or walking in the fields and forests of Ontario, or feeding my birds in the back of my townhouse, or watching my amazing little Beta fish who I think has been with me for over a year now, or talking to my parents on their small farm in the middle of Prince Edward Island where I have never been, or spending a weekend in Niagara Falls with my girlfriend -- all of these, I would sooner do than I would celebrate 'the glory of God' in a ritualized Church.

This is not to say that I haven't heard some fantastic sermons in my life, by some very passionate preachers who have chosen to celebrate 'God' and Life along a totally different path than me. Different people have different ways of expressing their passion -- both good and bad -- for life (and sometimes, most unfortunately, through rage, hate, violence, destruction, and the worshiping of pain, revenge, and death).

People choose similar and different Gods to worship. And then sometimes, they can get very passionate in terms of righteously and narcissistically protecting the particular God they have chosen to both worship -- and follow. Different Gods can take us to different places -- some to 'Heaven on Earth'; others to 'Hell on Earth'.

Thus, we have to be very careful about who and what we are worshipping. To say it again, our Gods -- and/or our 'Idols' (human renditions of Gods or humans with perceived 'God-like' qualities) -- are reflections or projections of our own individual and/or group idealism. But if our own self-idealism and/or the idealism of the group that we belong to -- is 'pathological' -- then we may be chasing our 'idealistic dream' to all sorts of related 'dehumanized and dehumanizing' places -- domination and submission, sadism and masochism, pain, rage, hate, divisionism, destruction, self-destruction, and ultimately -- an untimely and/or miserable death.

'Human Gods', 'human idols', 'human leaders' -- to the extent that they are able to 'sell' or 'intimidate' mass followers and mass followings, disguising pain as pleasure, sophism as truth, poison as candy, in effect turning the world and the world's humanistic-ethical value systems upside down and being able to convince their followers that everything is still 'right side up' (or intimidate and coerce them into at least pretending to believe this to be true) -- can easily create mass havoc, pain, grief, sickness, death, and dying, in effect, and Hell on Earth.

We can talk about many of the most powerful dictators in the world, past and present, in this light -- Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Genghis Khan, Alexander The Great, Napoleon, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao tse Tung...some mixing elements of 'humanism' and 'cultural explosion' with their mass killings (Alexander The Great, Napoleon) and others just being bad, bad, bad on some greater or lesser political and/or religious dimension...Charles Manson...


Going back to ancient, mythological times, we have 'Gods of Love' -- both the altruistic, nurturing type (Jesus Christ) and Gods of Romantic Love (Aphrodite, Cupid, Eros...) We have Gods of Power, Fairness, Justice, Truth (Zeus, Apollo, God)... We have Gods of The Earth (Gaea), Gods of Marriage and Family (Hera)...

Here, let me waste no more time citing Gods that could number in the hundreds if I went at the task with any precision...Here is a link giving you a larger sample:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Greek_mythological_figures
.............................................................................


And that is not even beginning to list the great number of 'mortal' Gods or ''Human Idols'...from ancient Greek mythology to present day 'pop-culture'...

Now you could say that we are through with all those Gods -- that we no longer worship them -- and that we have very much simplified the process today bringing everything down to the worshiping of 'one God' -- or 'monotheism'.

But does anyone really believe that we have stopped the process of 'God or Idol-Making' and the associated act of 'God or Idol-worshiping'?

So I ask the philosophical question again: What is this 'fixation' and/or 'obsessive-compulsion' with 'God and Idol-Making' and at the same time, the dialectic polarity of this act -- 'God and Idol Worshiping'?

In the next section, we will explore the relationship between Gods, Archetypes, Ego-States, Transference-Figures -- and Core Nuclear Personality Conflicts.

-- DGBN, Jan. 26th, 2009

-- David Gordon Bain

-- Democracy Goes Beyond Narcissism

-- Dialectic Gap-Bridging Negotiations...are still in process....

Gods, Myths, Idols, Humans -- and The Shifting Dialectic -- Meeting on The Shores of Personality Theory (and Interpersonal Conflict)

The dialectic is nice when people are on the same page, have good will, respect, empathy, and/or chemistry together...Lennon/McCartney at their best.......Dylan/Mike Bloomfield/Al Kooper on Highway 67 Revisted...

However, times change and the dialectic does not always work smoothly.

The dialectic does not usually work as smoothly when people lose their good will, respect, empathy, and/or chemistry towards each other -- and struggle coming to terms with whatever the dialectic problem or conflict is...

Overt and/or covert strife often results, including small or large wars, hot and/or cold tempers, impasses, alienation, aggression, coercion, manipulation, force, intimidation, provocation, retaliation, and so on...

The dialectic process has changed from a smooth, creative one, to a hostile destructive one.

The same husband and wife can work beautifully together when everything is going well together...especially in the earlier stages of their relationship... But can they sustain their good will for each other, their mutual respect and empathy after they have come to know each other's flaws, 'dialectic extremes' and 'dialectic avoidances'...

That is the 50 million dollar dialectic and existential question -- and the mark of whether a long term relationship stays together and can sustain itself in healthy fashion or not...

Same with business partners, co-workers, or employers and employees at work who may or may not be on the same page with each other depending on the context and the history of the situation.

Introduce people's ambitions, greed, selfishness, anal retentiveness, and the opposite...no ethics, no boundaries, no respect -- and the smooth-sailing dialectic starts to falls apart, and with it, the ability to problem solve, conflict-resolve, and worst of all, even the wish and the will to be together to try to sovle and/or resolve things.

Which brings us back to a fundamental question:

Which God(s)/Idol(s)/Archetype(s)/values....does each person most prioritize and/or worship...

Which 'ego-state' is running -- or at least dominating -- each person's individual ship?

Are the different Gods/Values/Priorities compatible?

Or is there a 'core nuclear conflict' in the relationship,

That is just buried under the surface, perculating, waiting to boil to the top --

And then boil over,

To become a huge, dramatic soap opera?

Greek soap operas from ancient days gone by...

Spilling over in the sky and on the ground...

As described in Greek myths like The Iliad and The Odyssey...

Are all too human...too human...

Pointing to only one, two, or three conclusions,

God made man in his/her own image,

Or, man made God in his/her own image,

Or, Gods are human and humans are Gods...

And they both meet on the shores of Personality Theory...


-- DGBN, Dec. 28th-29th, 2008.

-- David Gordon Bain

What are Gods? (Part 1)

Gods are metaphysical, mythological ideals, probably projected, or mainly projected, possibly not entirely, that are capable of being used for happy, healthy purposes, and/or abused for extremist, righteous, pathological purposes. Indeed, 'Gods' can be used for as many different abstract and/or concrete purposes as there are people out there who believe in them because every person is different, every person's abstract and concrete interpetation of 'God' is different, and every person's motivation, intent, and purpose is different, and can be woven around his or her ideal of God -- and/or visa versa -- to be used narcissistically and/or altruistically, constructively and/or destructively, healthily and/or pathologically, just as anything and everything else within man's field of awareness, epistemology, and ethics.

-- DGBN, Jan. 2nd, 2008.

-- David Gordon Bain

Rationality, Irrationality, Man and Gods: Which God Would You Like To Study? Apollo? Dionysus? Narcissus? Eros? Aphrodite? Or All Of Them?

Rationality and Irrationality, Man and Gods: Which God(s) Would You Like To Study?


Every time I start an essay on man's rationality,
Or at least his capability for rationality,
I get stuck,
And hit the brakes.

Why?

Because their is much more excitement and drama,
In pursuing man's irrationality...
Or at least his or her seeming irrationality...

However, irrationality is a very relative concept.
Irrationality becomes completely rational,
Or at least understandable,
And maybe sometimes 'bizarrely rational',
As soon as you understand,
Which God a person is worshipping,
Which God a person is pursuing,
Which God a person wants to be.
Which God would you sooner learn about?

Apollo -- the Greek God of rationality and ethics?
Or Dionysus (Nietzsche's infatuation -- and mine) -- the Greek God of pleasure and dance, and wine and group celebration, and sexuality and orgasm...pretty much everything Freud summed up in 'The Id'?
Or Freud's later infatuation (and mine): Narcissus -- the God of Ego, and Self-Inflation, and Self-Assertion, and Self-Absorption, and 'Will to Power', and 'Will to Fame and Ambition', and 'Will to Possess and Conquer', and 'Will To Revenge', and 'Will To Selfishness'...

Dionysus and Narcissus usually get along pretty well together...
Even throw Eros and Aphrodite into the mix (God and Goddess of Love),
And you still have a greaty party...

It's only Apollo who puts a damper on things,
And aims to spoil the party, spoil the fun,
Particularly when it starts to get completely out of hand,
And threatens to run completely amok,
Throwing chaos into law and order, ethics and morality...

Eros and Aprhodite -- these are interesting Gods too...
If you've been hit by the 'love bug', then you are chasing
Eros and/or Aphrodite,

While Dionysus and Narcissus are the Gods of...

Shall we say, the more sensual, sexual, and seedier side of love...

I.E. 'Lust'?

Or is it a complicated chemical mix of...
Sensuality, sexuality, love and lust, obsession, compulsion, addiction...
When all three or four of them come together in the same ignited package,

Eros/Aphrodite, Dionusus, and Narcissus,
Swarming Together,
To lift us up,
And/or bring us down,

What do we call them?

'The Terrific Threesome'?
Or 'The Terrible Threesome?

Or Both?

Obsession, compulsion, addiction, love, lust, sexuality, rejection, betrayal, abandonment, jealousy, envy, anger, grief, rage, aggression, violence, crimes of passion, crimes of transference, identification, projection, compensation, inferiority feelings, superiority striving, the 'darkness of the shadow', sexual fetishes, power and sex, domination and submission, sadism and masochism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, seduction, manipulation, coercion, force, serial crimes, serial rapes, serial killings...

Who would you sooner learn about?

Apollo?

Or Dionysus, Narcissus, Eros, and Aphrodite?
Wrapped together in one chemically charged package...
Transference. Transference Complexes, Transference Games, The Exciting Object, The Rejecting Object, Narcissitic Traumacies, Narcissistic Compensations, Narcissistic Identifications, Identification with The Aggressor, Identification With The Rejector, Identification With The Abandoner, Identification With The Distancer, Identification With The Betrayor, Identification With The Violator, Identification With The Abuser...

The first God -- Apollo -- was the God of The Enlightenment Period,
But I think you can begin to understand why,
Apollo, by himself, was not enough,
To define or describe or summarize,
Human Behavior...
Enter the Dragon,
The Transference Dragon,
Enter...The last four Gods -- Dionysus, Narcissus, Eros, and Aphrodite...
These were the Gods of The Romantic Period
The Fascinating Four,
Dionysus, Narcissus, Eros, and Aphrodite...
Did much to help describe...
The 'Other Side of Human Nature'...
The darker,
Sexier,
Seedier,
More romantic,
More sensual,
More spiritual,
More unpredictable,
Side of human behavior...

Which God(s) would you like to study?

Or would you like to study them all?

-- dgbn, Dec. 17th, 2008.
-- David Gordon Bain.

A New (Dec. 13/08) Multi-Dialectic (Multi-Bi-Polar) Model of The Human Psyche

As we close 2008, I am going to 'take another kick at the can' here relative to something that I have been doing for the last 30 years or so -- specifically, build another model of the human psyche, or worded otherwise, the human personality.

My influences are too many to mention but I will quickly off the top of my head name the main ones: Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, Fritz Perls (Laura Perls, Hefferline, Goodman...), Erich Fromm, Fairbairn, Eric Berne, Kohut, Hegel, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Korzybski, Hayakawa, Albert Ellis, George Kelly, Aaron Beck, Maxwell Maltz, Nathaniel Branden, Ayn Rand, Karl Marx, Anaxamander, Heraclitus, The Han Philosophers, Cannon, Derrida, Foucault, John Locke, Aristotle, Plato...

The model is a smaller version of 'Hegel's Hotel', partly realistic, partly idealistic -- ideally, something that we could/can all carry around in our heads from day to day, as those who invest their time and energy in this model seek to find their own individual, extremely elusive, always changing, dialectic-democratic, multi-bi-polar, homeostatic balance. The model is built partly -- indeed mainly in the name and vision of 'Gods, Myths, Philosophers, and Psychologists'...

Let it be clear from the outset that I am not 'mono-theistic'. I do not believe in one God; rather, I believe in many. I believe that all Gods are projections of the human mind, the human personality, and as such, are all an important part of us.

What we need to do in order to better 'self-empower' ourselves -- in all of our many bi-polarities and mult-dialectic complexities -- is to 're-own these Gods, re-own these projections', and bring them all back into an effective, dialectic-democratic 'Parliament of the Personality' where all these Gods, along with kings, philosophers, psychologists, poets, song-writers, and other leaders can have their individual say in how we choose to 'run our personality'. This is the ultimate goal of DGB Philosophy and 'Hegel's Hotel'.

What I have in mind relative to my DGB model of the personality builds completely from these three main entities:

1. John Locke and his famous idea of 'checks and balances' in British Parliament;

2. Friedrich Nietzsche's first book, 'The Birth of Tragedy' and its Psychoanalytic implications where the dramatic human adventures, conflicts, and tragedies of 'Apollo vs. Dionysus' would eventually become the dramatic human adventures, conflicts, and tragedies of 'The Superego vs. The Id', 'The Personna vs. The Shadow', 'The Righteous Ego vs. The Nurturing Ego', 'The Narcissistic Ego vs. The Altruistic Ego', 'The Ethical Ego vs. The Unethical Ego', 'The Authoritarian Ego vs. The Democratic Ego', 'The Conservative (Republican) Ego vs. The Liberal (Democratic) Ego', 'The Capitalist Ego vs. The Socialist Ego', and a host of other internal and external, personal and social 'dialectic-splits';

3. The Integrating (Synthesizing) force of the German Idealism of Immanuel Kant followed by Fichte, Schelling, and mainly, G.W.F. Hegel; combined with the the romantic-rational and irrational-humanistic-existential-post-modern-deconstructive influences of such philosophers as: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre, Foucault, Derrida, Erich Fromm, Ayn Rand, and finally -- DGB Philosophy.

No further explanations or extrapolations now.

They will have to wait for another day.

Let's go!


.................................................


A/ The Mainly Conscious Ego-States


1. The Central-Mediating Executive Ego (Zeus);

2. The Nurturing (Maternal) Topdog Ego (Gaia, Hera);

3. The Righteous-Critical(Paternal) Topdog Ego (Apollo)

4. The Narcissistic-Hedonistic Topdog Ego (Narcissus, Dionysus);

5. The Righteous-Rebellious Underdog Ego (Apollo);

6. The Narcissistic-Hedonistic Underdog Ego (Narcissus, Dionysus);

7. The Nurturing (Aproval-Seeking, Co-operating) Underdog Ego (Gaia, Hera);


................................................................


B/ Supporting Background Ego States and Functions


1. The Enlightenment (Rational, Ethical) Ego;

2. The Democratic-Dialectic (Equal Rights) Ego;

3. The Authoritarian (The Individual 'Will to Power', 'Will to Control') Ego;

4. The Humanistic (Compassionate, Empathic) Ego;

5. The Existential (Accountable to Self, Accountable to Others) Ego;

6. The Romantic-Spiritual (Impulsive, Creative, Irrational, Spontaneous, Unpredictable, Loving, In Harmony With Nature) Ego;

7. The Constructive-Creative-Structural (Thesis) Ego;

8. The Deconstructive (Post-Modern, Anti-Structural-Anti-Thesis) Ego;

9. The 'Process' (Heraclitus, Korzybski, Hawakawa, Gestalt Principle of -- 'Life is always Subject to Change') Ego;

10. The 'Associative' (Comparing, Generalizing) Ego;

11. The 'Distinctive' (Contrasting, Distinguishing) Ego;

12. The Integrating or Synthesizing (Heraclitus, The Han Philosophers -- yin-yang, Nietzsche's Birth of Tragedy, Freud, Jung, Perls, the Cannon principle of -- 'homeostatic balance', the DGB principle of 'dialetic-democratic balance') Ego;


..............................................................................


C/ Mainly Subconscious Ego States and Functions

1. The Subconscious, Dynamic, Creative Ego (including driving, underlying compensatory and projective transference complexes);

2. The Subconscious, Structural, Network and Template of Transference-Memory Complexes (including memories, beliefs, values, value-judgments, associations, distinctions, traumacies, tragedies, and source f driving, underlying compensatory and projective transference complexes);

3. The Driving Caldron of Biological-Psychological Impulses that closely equates with what Freud called 'The Id';

4. The Subconscious Genetic, Symbolic, Mythological, Archetype and 'Self-Potential' Template that roughly equates with what Jung called 'The Collective Unconscious'.


...........................................................................


As mentioned at the outset of this essay, this DGB model of the human psyche/personality builds upon and expands on John Locke's political principle of 'checks and balances' and his application of this principle to his Ideal Model of an effectively safe and working British Parliament.

Political parliaments are simply externalizations or projections of the internal workings of the human personality (just like religions and all other elements of human culture). Some governments obviously emphasize some internal workings of the human personality over others -- both good and/or bad (again, just like religions).

I will let you 'chew' on this latest DGB model for what it might mean or not mean to you at this point of time.


All explanations and extrapolations will have to wait for another day.


-- DGBN, Sunday December 13th, 2008.

-- David Gordon Bain

-- Democracy Goes Beyond Narcissism

-- Dialectic Gap-Bridging Negotiations...


Are still in process...


.................................................................................

Conceptual Narcissism, Death's Door -- and Hegel's Hotel

What is 'conceptual narcissism'? It is a private obsession with an idea -- and/or an ideal. This specifically human phenomenon can have both an inspirational-heroic and/or a dark side attached to it...It all depends on the unique context and dynamics of the situation...

For me, my conceptual narcissism -- and obsession -- revolves around two connected ideas: 1. 'the dialectic' -- which has a long philosophical and psychological history before me revolving mainly around the creative masterpiece of G.W. Hegel's --'The Phenomnenology of Spirit-(often alternatively translated as 'Mind').

And 2. -- that of 'Hegel's Hotel' -- which is my own private, creative baby, inspiration, and lifeblood -- some 35 years in the making starting with two motivational books I read in the early 1970s (Hayakawa's 'Language in Thought and Action', and Maxwell Maltz's 'Psycho-Cybernetics'), a series of university essays I wrote finishing with my Honours Thesis in Psychology, 'Evaluation and Health', 1979, and later a series of underground, self-inspired and inspiring, home-made essays in the early 1980s ('Conflict in The Personality', and a series of unfinished essays on the subject of 'Transference'), and then again in the early 2000s, now buried in my writing archives, some of which I wish to re-cycle -- all moving towards this final crescendo, this 'wholistic-dialectic-integrative-humanistic-existential network of essays and blogsites' that I have named -- 'Hegel's Hotel'.. .

Hegel's Hotel is a very large integrative 'philosophy-psychology-political-economic-romantic-spiritual-artistic-natural health...' work consisting of a network of some 50 plus blogsites in various stages of development from 'not started' to 'finished' or 'almost finished'.

The full name for the project is 'Hegel's Hotel: DGB Post-Hegelian Philosophy-Psychology...'. Each 'floor' (blogsite) of Hegel's Hotel will have a varying number of essays on/in it -- ranging from about 10 to 30 essays. Using simple multiplication, that means I am now shooting to finish about 1000 philosophical essays -- or let us say more modestly, 500 to 1000 essays -- before or by the time I reach 60 years old, touch wood, God willing.

I do not say this lightly or easily because right now I do not take my health and my life lightly or easily. I am an 'aging baby boomer' like many of you fellow baby boomers out there -- myself, born in 1955 -- grudgingly I admit to being three years into my 50s this year. I have already had one major health scare in which I walked away from a liver biopsy partly because I was scared of what they might find, but also because I was tired of seeing the inside of Southlake Hospital, tired of seeing liver and blood specialists, tired of taking diagnostic tests and 'partly invavsive operations (ERCPs)', tired of being 'yellow', tired of just starting to feel better -- only to go down for the count again in another relapse, after a first and second ERCP operation...

So I walked away from the liver biopsy, for better or for worse, stuck mainly to a raw fruit and vegetable diet, started taking milk thistle (which is an herb that is supposed to help re-generate the liver)...and at least I can say today, about a year after the start of this whole ordeal, 8 or 9 months after the end of it last August, that I am back to normal colour and able to write this piece...I don't expect any miracles, I will be more than happy if I have 3 to 5 good writing years ahead of me...I will be more than happy if I make 60. I do not expect to see old age -- unless I start seriously working out to get this aging body of mine into a lot better shape than it is right now... And when it comes to physical fitness...talk is cheap...Either you do it or you don't...That's an 'existential decision' that each and every one of us has to make each and every day...

I say all this not to be or sound morbid but rather to accentuate the existential reality that we are all sooner or later facing: the reality of being chased by death.

There comes a point where life is no longer just about life but rather it is about the conflicting dialectic between life and death. Freud's 'dialectic playoff between the life and death instinct' takes centre stage here. Only it is not a completely 'deterministic dialectic playoff here' -- partly it is, based on genes, random life experiences, and the aging-dying process.

However, the struggle between life and death is also an 'existential dialectic playoff' where we can make individual and/or collective choices, and do individual and/or collective things to either embrace life and/or to play into death's hands.

For me, I view and experience 'the creative building of Hegel's Hotel' as an important individual choice for me to embrace life to the fullest capacity in my writing.

Call this my obsession with conceptual narcissism if you wish but hopefully my writing will inspire, motivate, bring new awarenesses and education, provoke controversies and differences of opinion -- and new integrations -- in you, my most esteemed readers, whether you be academically and/or pragmatically inclined. I seek to dialectically bridge the gap between academia on the one side and day-to-day, common sense pragmatic living on the other side. As well, I seek to dialectically bridge the gap between the polarities of narcisisism and altruism -- when life is working best we are both giving to others and getting for ourselves at the same time what we both need in terms of incorporating fresh life and energy into our respective individual and collective existence(s).

Existentially, I view the building of Hegel's Hotel -- to my personal satisfaction relative to the quality of its essays and its relative completion -- as a race for me between life and death. God-Nature give me 3 to 5 years of good writing energy and I should finish Hegel's Hotel -- at least in its main essence, dynamics, and structure.

In the meantime, I think of others younger than me who have not been so lucky. My ex-common-law wife's sister dead at about 39 from serious drug abuse; a good friend's husband dead at 49 (last year) from a massive heart attack. Life didn't give either of them any more chances than they had already been given...

And I also think of my cousin, a few years older than me, battling on death's doorstep with some sort of very serious, mysterious virus that the medical community can't completely figure out and/or reverse. I pray for the grace of God and/or some sort of a miracle here. I cringe that any morning I will get an email from my dad expressing the worst of bad news...that there was no such miracle left for her to grab onto... Again, I hear the haunting tune of an old song in my head by some old if not deceased band members of The Jefferson Airplane/Starship (their 'alter-ego' band was called 'Hot Tuna' for those few of you who may remember...).... The tune was called: 'Death Don't Have No Mercy in this Land'...

In situations such as this, concepts suddenly become hollow and shallow when a loved one suddenly or not so suddenly comes close to, and/or passes through 'death's door'...

I cannot write with the same kind of passion and internal solidarity when I come home to an empty house, estranged -- and/or just physically absent from -- the loved ones who are most important to me...I write best in the morning with the fresh optimism of a new day -- and the chance for fresh life, fresh, inspirational, new encounters...either with people, ideas, or preferrably both.

Hegel's Hotel is a metaphor -- a metaphysical construct -- that we can conceptually carry around in our individual and/or collective mind(s) if we wish -- either in its entirety or in any smaller piece or portion, unmodified, or integrated with your own 'personal stuff'...

When I write about this philosopher, or that psychologist, or this mythological God...I am creating a 'room' in Hegel's Hotel for that person/God. Why? Because from my vantage point, that philospher-psychologist wrote something about life-existence-man that had important meaning which still carries significant relevance for us today. Or this mythological God was a projection/reflection of ancient man that again still carries significant meaning and relevance for us today.

Now each one of these 'rooms' in Hegel's Hotel which has 'functional meaning and value' for us today can be carried around in our minds as a source of inspirational and motivational reference. 'Internalized' or 'introjected' -- call any particular 'room' in Hegel's Hotel a 'self-ego-functional-value-energy centre'. A place in our mind of functional value and importance -- and driving energy to get there.

View the 'Hegel's Hotel: DGB Working Model of The Psyche' as a model of the 'ego-self as it does function, can be functioning, and/or should be functioning. To repeat, it is only a model, a metaphysical construct, a piece of conceptual narcissism that hopefully has altruistic, functional value and meaning and can be 're-constructed' or 'deconstructed at a moment's notice. Everything is subject to change including how you may modify the model to suit your own private, functional purposes. The model -- or models -- will offer a summarized, reduced rendition of the full contents of every room of Hegel's Hotel.

With this in mind, let's look at such a summarized model...

P.S. This evening I went to the kettle to make a cup of tea. Unlike most days where I just throw a Tetley tea bag into a cup, today I pulled out a tea pot. I proceeded to throw in a green tea bag. Then a black tea bag. Then a ginseng tea bag. Then an Earl Grey tea bag...

My son is very wary of my 'kitchen concoctions'. He has seen some pretty strange ones over the years of my 'single fatherhood' -- from the time he was about 5 years old. Very rarely has he gathered the courage and sense of adventure to actually try one one of my concoctions. He just looks at me and shakes my head. He's now 23. I think I must be preparing in my head for the introduction of my 'DGB Super-Multi-Dialectic-Humanistic-Existential-Integrative Model' of the human psyche'. Try getting the words out on that one out. Sounds like a word from the movie 'Mary Poppins'...

I can feel the creative juices flowing in my head. They just need to brew a bit longer...Hopefully, the model will be a little better than most of my kitchen concoctions...

-- dgb, May 4th, 2008.